Oregon’s Hostile Takeover of Medical Marijuana

medibles@2x

Late Wednesday evening, the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) hurriedly submitted draft rules designed to keep marijuana-infused foods and candies from children. These new rules are being proposed after passage of Senate bill 1531 on Wednesday. This quick action reveals step two in Oregon’s hostile takeover of dispensaries and medical cannabis.

The new draft rules state that a dispensary may not sell or transfer to patients many common marijuana-infused products (medibles):

“ ‘Candy’ means a sweet food made with sugar, syrup or some other sweetener that may or may not be combined with fruit, chocolate, or nuts. ‘Candy’ includes but is not limited to candy bars, chocolates, licorice, sour candies, salty candies, hard candies, gumdrops, gummies, and marshmallows.”

“A registered facility may not transfer a tetrahydrocannabinol-infused product that is manufactured in a form that resembles cake-like products, cookies, candy, or gum, or that otherwise may be attractive to minors because of its shape, color, or taste.”

“[The rules] are set to go into effect next week,” said Karynn Fish, a spokeswoman for the OHA. “Dispensaries, at that point, won’t be allowed to legally dispense marijuana-infused items such as cookies and candies.”

The OHA is basically outlawing “medibles,” or cannabis-infused foods often in the shape of snack mixes, lollipops, cakes, brownies, cookies, soda etc. This action shuts down the entire medical marijuana medible industry in Oregon effective next week.

Thousands of patients are going to be without the products they rely on. Many patients do not smoke cannabis, and are basically unwilling to. Some patients cannot smoke cannabis even if they wanted to.

For some patients it is completely inappropriate to smoke cannabis.

So, what about the kids? Children cannot smoke, they cannot vaporize. The only medicinal forms of cannabis they can utilize are medibles, oils and topicals. If we allow this type of control of the medical cannabis industry to take place, then what is stopping them from seeking to outlaw concentrates like full extract cannabis oil or banning the production and sale of topicals like lotions and salves?

The argument of keeping cannabis infused products out of the hands of children is an understandable one, even though there are pediatric patients, not everyone wants their kids high, nor is it appropriate.

One would think though, that instead of an Orwellian gutting of an entire blossoming industry the patients, producers and businesses rely on, why not just go with childproof packaging and child-deterrent labeling?

The draft rules by the OHA not only cover medibles, they also cover childproof packaging:

(b) “Child-resistant safety packaging” means:

(A) Tamper-proof, child-proof containers designed and constructed to be significantly difficult for children under 5 years of age to open and not difficult for normal adults to use properly;

(B) Opaque so that the product cannot be seen from outside the packaging; (C) Closable for any product intended for more than a single use or containing multiple servings; and

(D) Labeled in accordance with OAR 333-008-1220.

According to the rules, the childproof packaging required for cannabis infused products would be much more difficult for a child to access than a standard prescription bottle. If the safe and non-toxic cannabis infused product needs to be more difficult to access by a child than Oxycontin, so be it. Why would the state then ban the sale of the items, therefore ending production and robbing patients of relief?

We need to tell the state of Oregon to stop protecting what does not need protected. Parents are responsible for keeping their children out of the medicine cabinet and liquor cabinet. Why then can’t parents be left responsible for keeping their children out of the medical Cannabis stash?

Email your comments, or concerns to the Oregon Health Authority: medmj.dispensaries@state.or.us

Brandon Krenzler is a free-thinking father, opinionated blogger and vegetarian living organically in Oregon. He is interested in, health, history, art and nature. Krenzler is part of a team of two, including wife Erin Purchase, who treat their daughter, Brave Mykayla, with medical cannabis for her diagnosis of leukemia. He is also an active and vocal advocate for the rights of parents and children who seek the therapeutic use of cannabis. He grows and uses cannabis both recreationally and medicinally, like every human being should be allowed. Krenzler is a freelance contributor to Cannabis Now Magazine.

4 Comments

  1. KathyD

    March 24, 2014 at 6:54 am

    Adult patients should be allowed to use an herb as they see fit. Medicine does not need to be nasty. It should be soothing. What does it matter if it is served or consumed in brownies or green beans? That issue is all about control freaks having a hard time giving up control on something they never had control of to begin with. They never were meant to. You can’t control a gift from God, His medicine for us or what humans are wired for.

  2. Harlowe Thrombey

    March 23, 2014 at 10:20 am

    This law will create healthy medibles. Since the medibles community seems so obsessed with sugary crap…. we needed the government to step in, in this case. It won’t hurt. It will help.

    • not bob

      May 6, 2014 at 11:45 am

      Do we never leanr ?
      This will not lead to safer food, less sugary foods or even a reduction in the consumption of medibles, all it will accomplish is to create another black market where people who need edibles will get them illegally.

  3. Tim Bowles

    March 22, 2014 at 4:40 am

    People can take tincture or infused oil right on your tongue. It works great. So called medibles are not necessary just a tradition. I have been reading about a lot of pets kids & others getting dosed. It’s bad press we don ‘t need.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>